Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:55:01
Bill Richardson has probably been anal-probed
Wow. And people think of voting for this guy for anything? I mean, I wouldn’t elect him dog catcher.
If he wins his bid for the White House, Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson may be just the man to get to the bottom of the 60-year-old Roswell UFO mystery.
Answering questions at a townhall meeting Friday, a Dell employee asked Richardson about the 1947 incident in which many people still believe a flying saucer landed near the eastern New Mexico town.
“I’ve been in government a long time, I’ve been in the cabinet, I’ve been in the Congress and I’ve always felt that the government doesn’t tell the truth as much as it should on a lot of issues,” said Richardson, who is governor of New Mexico.
“When I was in Congress I said (to the) Department of Defense ... ‘What is the data? What is the data you have?’ “
He was told that the records were classified.
“That ticked me off,” he said, as the crowd laughed.
“What do you want me to do? You want me to open up all those files?” he asked the alien enthusiast, who answered that he did.
“I’ll work with you on that.”
He’s either pandering to nuts on purpose, which is pretty sad, or he is a nut in the style of Alex Jones and so forth. Which means he’s not capable of leading a parade, much less the country. Add this new lunacy to his untenable stance on immigration (amnesty, closer ties with Mexico’s government, more easily obtained visas and no border fencing) and you get a nutburger of the highest order.
Of course, being a Democrat, he’s got about as much chance of beating Obama as I do of winning Miss World. And since Obama couldn’t beat Hillary with a hockey stick even if she were tied down and blindfolded, I think we’re safe from Bill “The Aliens Have Landed” Richardson.
Hat tip: Jules Crittenden via Ace.
Posted by JimK at 03:55 PM on October 28, 2007
Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email to a friend |
Categories: News, Politics
Tags:
Technorati: Election 2008
Politics
Bill Richardson
Comments:
#2 Posted by JimK 
on 10/28 at 06:24 PM -
You know why I don’t like Mitt? Not his pseudo-conservatism. Not his tax & spend philosophy. Not his religion. Not even his views on socialized medicine.
I hate his hair. I don’t trust his hair.
Crazy, but it’s true.
#3 Posted by Buzzion on 10/28 at 06:51 PM -
Last debate he had a moment where it actually wasn’t perfect. I figured you wouldn’t like him because he’s in the “video games are the root of all evil” camp. First one to go against that you’d probably vote for them.
Me, I’d vote for the first one to come out saying this on alcohol: “Three words on drinking: I like it.” Well unless its Teddy the Swimmer
#4 Posted by Christian on 10/28 at 07:21 PM -
Sigh…
Okay, just because the fucktard is the governor of my state does not mean that I would vote for him if I had to. He was elected by all the liberals who live in Santa Fe and and Albequerque who hated the libertarian governor we had before this drunken idiot. And I know he’s a drunken idiot because when he was a Congressman of my fine state, I had the honor of meeting him in DC with my debate team. Rude, drunk, and really smelly are the adjectives that come from that meeting. 2 terms of pretty much nothen, riding the crest of the increase in oil revenues from my part of the state, he has time to go out and pretend to be a “statesman”, like his junket to North Korea last year.
And your right. I think Romney’s hair is actually a Triffid that’s controlling him.
#5 Posted by Drumwaster on 10/29 at 01:50 AM -
And since Obama couldn’t beat Hillary with a hockey stick even if she were tied down and blindfolded, I think we’re safe from Bill “The Aliens Have Landed” Richardson.
I don’t know. Mayhap you’re forgotten in exactly which ways Richardson was used during BJ’s administration…
RSS (Subscribe)
Tip jars (Donate today!)
#1 Posted by gcanter
on 10/28 at 05:35 PM -
I’d take him over Romney…